h1

McCartney attacks China over fur

April 30, 2010

by Adrian Addison–BBC Six O’clock News (November 28, 2005)

Sir Paul McCartney has vowed never to perform in China after seeing horrific undercover footage of dogs and cats being killed for their fur.

The former Beatle also said he would boycott the 2008 Beijing Olympics after viewing the footage taken in a fur market in Guangzhou, southern China.

The film shows animals being thrown from a bus, and into boiling water.

A Chinese official said boycotts were not justified, and blamed US and European consumers for buying the fur.

In the film, dogs and cats packed by the dozen into wire cages little bigger than lobster pots are pictured being thrown from the top deck of a converted bus onto concrete pavements.

The screaming animals, many with their paws now smashed from the fall, are then lifted out with long metal tongs and thrown over a seven foot fence.

They are then killed and skinned for their fur.

Animal welfare group Peta believes many of them are still alive as their skins are peeled away.

“I wouldn’t even dream of going over there to play in the same way I wouldn’t go to a country that supported apartheid ”–Sir Paul McCartney

Sir Paul, and his wife Heather, looked aghast and close to tears as they watched the footage for a special report for the BBC’s Six O’clock News to be screened on Monday.

They urged people not to buy Chinese goods.

“This is barbaric. Horrific,” said Sir Paul.

“It’s like something out of the dark ages. And they seem to get a kick out it. They’re just sick, sick people.

“I wouldn’t even dream of going over there to play, in the same way I wouldn’t go to a country that supported apartheid. This is just disgusting. It’s just against every rule of humanity. I couldn’t go there.”

In another piece of the harrowing footage, shot this summer by an undercover investigator connected to the People for the Ethical treatment of Animals (Peta) campaign group, cats are seen squirming inside a sack which is then thrown into a vat of steaming water.

They are boiled to death and skinned by a fleecing machine similar to a launderette tumble drier.

Some of the 28-minute footage is too gruesome to be broadcast.

Campaigners estimate that over two million dogs and cats are killed for their fur in China every year. China also farms animals such as mink for their fur and makes over half of the world’s fur products.

McCartney added: “How can the host nation of the Olympics be seen allowing animals to be treated in this terrible way?”

Heather McCartney, herself a vociferous animal rights campaigner added: “I’ve seen so much footage where these poor creatures are clearly alive when they’re skinned. And for what? For fashion? It’s sick.

“People in every other country in the world should now boycott Chinese goods.”

“If they want to consider themselves a civilized nation,” said Sir Paul, “they’re going to have to stop this.”
A spokesman for the Chinese Ambassador in London told the BBC: “Though cats and dogs are not endangered, we do not encourage the ill treatment of cats and dogs.

“But, anyway, the fur trade mostly feeds markets in the US and Europe. Most of this fur is not for the Chinese market. So the Americans and Europeans should accept the blame.

“We have no plans to clamp down on this internally that I am aware of – it is for the US and Europeans to take their own action. They should boycott fur as a fashion material.

“I do not agree with Mr McCartney and his wife’s point of view – a boycott of Chinese goods and the Olympics is simply not justifiable.”

It is not currently illegal to trade in dog and cat fur in the UK and most of Europe.

Ethical abhorrence

But the UK government sees any legislation as being a European issue – as once the fur enters Europe from China, free trade and the difficulty of identifying the fur makes it almost impossible to police.

A DTI spokesman told the BBC: “The government shares the ethical abhorrence felt by many. That is why it banned by statute fur farming in the UK in 2000.

“Action is best taken at the EU level as a harmonised approach throughout the EU would have greater impact and avoid obstacles to the operation of the single market.”

HAVE YOUR SAY

“Sir Paul shouldn’t impose his Western views on the ancient and unique Chinese culture ”–Mike Davies, Lancs, UK

There is little evidence, as yet, of the fur products being sold in the UK. Campaigners insist they are available up and down the country, but it is impossible to tell the difference from other fur without the aid of expensive genetic tests.

The British Fur Trade Association, which represents the booming fur industry in the UK, insists that its members do not knowingly use dog and cat fur and have introduced a fur labelling system to try to guard against its use.

“As an industry, we are against any form of animal cruelty,” said a spokeswoman.

“We deplore and work against the mistreatment of animals. For this reason, we also actively support and encourage the adoption of Western fur farming practices on Chinese fur farms.”

Ruse accusation

But pro-fur campaigner Richard D North says a European ban is heavy handed.

“This is a ruse by campaigners to attack the legitimate fur trade. Nobody has ever found a large amount of cat and dog fur in the UK.

“The European fur industry would never use it. Why bother, when there are lovely skins from properly farmed animals?”

Euro MP Struan Stevenson has an array of cat and dog products in his Brussels office – including a coat made from Alsatian skin, a pelt made from four golden retrievers and a blanket made from around 70 cats. All were bought in Europe.

“It’s cheaper to make these things from cat and dog than it is to make synthetic fur,” he told the BBC.

“It really is time for this trade to be banned and the EU border to be sealed against it. And the new trade commissioner is more than sympathetic.”

Markos Kyprianou, EU Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection, is responsible for this area of EU law.

His spokesman, Phillip Todd, told the BBC: “As a human being, the commissioner abhors this trade and is very supportive of there being a ban. There are, however, legal obstacles which would need to be addressed before a ban could be put in place.”

Have you got a story or tip-off which you think we should be investigating?

E-mail Adrian on six@bbc.co.uk

About these ads

3 comments

  1. why dont u support the blog with pictures. it would be appealing and can invoke serious interests.


    • Hi Sanu–there are quite a few pictures if you go through more posts. Did you see the video link to the McCartney campaign? If not, you should definitely click on the link and check it out. I will, however, keep it in mind and try to add even more pictures. :) Thank you so much for your feedback and for visiting my site.


    • Are you satisfied with the pictures now?



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: